Everyone in this industry publishes a number. A number is unfalsifiable, which is exactly why they publish it. Here is the list instead — every site we check, by name, and every place we fall short.
Pulled live from the registry when you loaded this page
These are the exact lists the scanner uses. They come from the same function the scan calls, so this page cannot drift from what actually happens: changing one changes the other. Run a scan and compare.
Court and arrest aggregators. Near-identical single-state sites republishing court records sit in our registry and no scan below the top tier goes near them. They are trivially easy to add and would inflate our count overnight — but nobody can delete a court record, so every one of them would be a finding we can't act on. A bigger number made of things we can't fix is a worse product, not a better one.
Germany and Austria. Not a coverage gap. Our counsel gated both out of this launch, so we do not scan or file there — however much data those directories hold. That is a legal decision and we would rather say so than quietly pad the map.
Some of the largest US people-search sites refuse automated requests outright. Not a CAPTCHA we could solve — their network edge returns a refusal before any page is served. We have worked through every free technique we could find and measured each one:
| What we tried | Result |
|---|---|
| Browser-identical TLS fingerprint | Works. Roughly doubled what the scan finds, and costs nothing |
| Session warming — visit the homepage first, like a person would | Works. Unlocked two of the big US sites |
| A full stealth browser against the walled sites | Dead. They return a refusal of a few hundred bytes — there is no page for a browser to render |
| Routing through our own network egress | Dead, and worse than not doing it |
| Search-engine caches, sitemaps, archive snapshots | Dead. Several refuse even robots.txt |
So when a site blocks us, we say so. Your scan reports
blocked, not clear. Telling you that you're not listed
somewhere we were simply refused would be the one lie this product must never tell —
and it is the lie that is easiest to get away with, because you would have no way of
knowing.
Every site above publishes a profile, which is the only reason a scan can find it. The larger part of the data-broker industry publishes nothing at all — it buys and sells quietly, and no scanner on earth can look inside. We count … of those in our registry.
They are unreachable by scanning and completely reachable by law. GDPR Article 15 and its US equivalents oblige a broker to tell you what they hold; Article 17 obliges them to erase it. That takes a formal request to each one, tracked to a deadline — which is the part we automate, and the reason coverage here is a legal question rather than a technical one.
Nothing on this page is typed in by hand. The counts come from /coverage and the site lists from /coverage/targets, both generated from the same registry and the same code the scanner runs. If we ever quietly dropped a site, this page would change with it.
Free, no account, nothing stored. The scan takes under a minute.
Run a free scan →
None of Their Business ·
Home ·
Help ·
Privacy ·
Contact
You pay us. That's the only way we make money. That's the point.